Cats may look at kings.

"[...]the well-subsidised columns and the queenly old typeface of that magazine depress one's standards."

Sunday, September 19, 2010

And also...

Adultery seems still to be a primary American (sub)urban concern, the kind of thing that can fuel a 576-page tome without seeming to lose any of its originality, as fresh as it was when Updike, in 1960, first made his claim on its uniquely voyeuristic territory.
Posted by "Does this refer to me?" "Oh no, it is I who am inane." at 12:41 AM

No comments:

Post a Comment

Newer Post Older Post Home
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Blog Archive

  • ►  2012 (7)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  April (1)
    • ►  February (5)
  • ►  2011 (21)
    • ►  October (2)
    • ►  September (2)
    • ►  August (2)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  May (4)
    • ►  April (4)
    • ►  March (2)
    • ►  January (4)
  • ▼  2010 (26)
    • ►  December (9)
    • ►  November (8)
    • ►  October (3)
    • ▼  September (4)
      • Don't read widely!
      • Chimamanda Adichie...
      • And also...
      • Audiobooks suck...
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  April (1)
  • ►  2009 (40)
    • ►  November (7)
    • ►  October (4)
    • ►  August (6)
    • ►  July (2)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ►  April (1)
    • ►  March (8)
    • ►  February (5)
    • ►  January (6)
  • ►  2008 (32)
    • ►  November (3)
    • ►  October (8)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  April (2)
    • ►  March (8)
    • ►  February (6)
    • ►  January (3)
  • ►  2007 (60)
    • ►  December (2)
    • ►  November (7)
    • ►  October (7)
    • ►  September (2)
    • ►  August (3)
    • ►  July (5)
    • ►  June (6)
    • ►  May (2)
    • ►  April (3)
    • ►  March (5)
    • ►  February (18)
Watermark theme. Powered by Blogger.