Cats may look at kings.

"[...]the well-subsidised columns and the queenly old typeface of that magazine depress one's standards."

Wednesday, November 4, 2009

Heh.
Posted by "Does this refer to me?" "Oh no, it is I who am inane." at 10:41 AM

No comments:

Post a Comment

Newer Post Older Post Home
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Blog Archive

  • ►  2012 (7)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  April (1)
    • ►  February (5)
  • ►  2011 (21)
    • ►  October (2)
    • ►  September (2)
    • ►  August (2)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  May (4)
    • ►  April (4)
    • ►  March (2)
    • ►  January (4)
  • ►  2010 (26)
    • ►  December (9)
    • ►  November (8)
    • ►  October (3)
    • ►  September (4)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  April (1)
  • ▼  2009 (40)
    • ▼  November (7)
      • "Signs are taken for wonders. "We would see a sign!""
      • Astonishing.
      • A counterpoint with which I largely agree. Wood is...
      • If there's only one thing you can read this week, ...
      • Heh.
      • This tactile, fey pleasure from Julian Barnes is t...
      • The most excellent video in the observable universe.
    • ►  October (4)
    • ►  August (6)
    • ►  July (2)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ►  April (1)
    • ►  March (8)
    • ►  February (5)
    • ►  January (6)
  • ►  2008 (32)
    • ►  November (3)
    • ►  October (8)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  April (2)
    • ►  March (8)
    • ►  February (6)
    • ►  January (3)
  • ►  2007 (60)
    • ►  December (2)
    • ►  November (7)
    • ►  October (7)
    • ►  September (2)
    • ►  August (3)
    • ►  July (5)
    • ►  June (6)
    • ►  May (2)
    • ►  April (3)
    • ►  March (5)
    • ►  February (18)
Watermark theme. Powered by Blogger.