Cats may look at kings.

"[...]the well-subsidised columns and the queenly old typeface of that magazine depress one's standards."

Tuesday, March 17, 2009

I rarely put up links for their own sake, but this one made me laugh out loud (for the first time in a few weeks).
Posted by "Does this refer to me?" "Oh no, it is I who am inane." at 12:53 AM

No comments:

Post a Comment

Newer Post Older Post Home
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Blog Archive

  • ►  2012 (7)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  April (1)
    • ►  February (5)
  • ►  2011 (21)
    • ►  October (2)
    • ►  September (2)
    • ►  August (2)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  May (4)
    • ►  April (4)
    • ►  March (2)
    • ►  January (4)
  • ►  2010 (26)
    • ►  December (9)
    • ►  November (8)
    • ►  October (3)
    • ►  September (4)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  April (1)
  • ▼  2009 (40)
    • ►  November (7)
    • ►  October (4)
    • ►  August (6)
    • ►  July (2)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ►  April (1)
    • ▼  March (8)
      • Another frustrating incomplete article
      • Infinite louda
      • `The Actors'
      • I rarely put up links for their own sake, but this...
      • Contains, as it surely must, several rather revel...
      • The elementary rule of three
      • Eagleton on Spivak
      • Why not feel?
    • ►  February (5)
    • ►  January (6)
  • ►  2008 (32)
    • ►  November (3)
    • ►  October (8)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  April (2)
    • ►  March (8)
    • ►  February (6)
    • ►  January (3)
  • ►  2007 (60)
    • ►  December (2)
    • ►  November (7)
    • ►  October (7)
    • ►  September (2)
    • ►  August (3)
    • ►  July (5)
    • ►  June (6)
    • ►  May (2)
    • ►  April (3)
    • ►  March (5)
    • ►  February (18)
Watermark theme. Powered by Blogger.